Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg...
by alexanderskates on Monday March 22, 2021 @04:23AM
(#26538093)
Given the cost of developing a single drug can be in the billions of dollars, what financial incentive is there for companies to spend so much on R&D and clinical development if there is no commercial exclusivity rights at the end of the pipeline? You could nationalise drug development but that is a lot of risk to burden the taxpayer with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg...
by fastball on Monday March 22, 2021 @11:40AM
(#26542367)
What financial incentive is there for drug companies to ever cure anything when instead they can just develop drugs that alleviate symptoms, which you must then purchase in-perpetuity?
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg...
by breck on Monday March 22, 2021 @11:58AM
(#26542613)
This is the best retort. I'm going to start using this, thanks.
The one I usually go with is "It actually costs $1T to develop a drug. $999B in basic research paid by US taxpayers and $1B in just enough frivolous novelty for the bigpharma company to get a patent racket going".