Re:GPT Neo: open-source GPT model, with pretrained 1.3B & 2....
by stellaathena on Sunday March 21, 2021 @11:38PM
(#26536606)
It's literally a couple people hanging out in a discord channel and doing this as a way to procrastinate their jobs.
Re:GPT Neo: open-source GPT model, with pretrained 1.3B & 2....
by mirekrusin on Monday March 22, 2021 @03:26AM
(#26537767)
Peak of laziness - build ai to do your job so you have more time building ai.
Re:GPT Neo: open-source GPT model, with pretrained 1.3B & 2....
by ShamelessC on Monday March 22, 2021 @08:31PM
(#26549410)
I think it would help your PR efforts to let people know that more often. People hear "we are <org_name>" and assume you're, you know, an organization. That comes with some amount of expected bug fixes, documentation, verifying results _before_ you release, etc.
I'm not really sure how much you gain by attracting tons of people to the discord if you finally release and everyone has unreasonable expectations due to the way you advertise the group as a whole.
Re:GPT Neo: open-source GPT model, with pretrained 1.3B & 2....
by stellaathena on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @11:56AM
(#26568873)
This'll probably sound silly, but we weren't really expecting much of a response. We've been sitting on these models (they were trained for the Pile paper) for months for no particular reason besides being focused on other things. We figured we'd put it out there in case anyone was interested and then Aran's tweet blew up hard.
Re:GPT Neo: open-source GPT model, with pretrained 1.3B & 2....
by ShamelessC on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:02AM
(#26577229)
Fair enough! I can personally attest to the results being quite impressive now. Fantastic work and apologies for the criticism. It must be a strange situation to get dragged in to all this due to a viral tweet.
This is not meant as a goad to you, but more just as more info for everyone, my understanding is it is an open source community of like minded people type project (as opposed to a bigco) and actively solicits contributions (by which I mean code and data) so anyone seeing room for improvement is welcome to step in from what I can tell.
I did find your comment helpful and informative; just adding another angle here.