News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF by mjg59 on Sunday March 21, 2021 @09:24PM (#26535821)
Sure! The response to someone who is deliberately offensive and someone who habitually offends people by accident should be different, and I don't think anyone denies that. But that's not an argument for doing nothing in response to someone who habitually offends people by accident.
Re:Richard Stallman is coming back to the board of the FSF by hntrader on Sunday March 21, 2021 @10:52PM (#26536367)

  "But that's not an argument for doing nothing in response to someone who habitually offends people by accident."
Well that really depends. Offense is sometimes a strategy employed by cynical actors to gain a political advantage.

If I say that your posts are constantly offending me, what do you propose we do about that?

There isn't a universally applicable rule here.

This is also where the driving analogy breaks down. It's an easy trade-off to revoke someone's license if it means we can prevent death. But taking action to prevent subjective offense enters into a much more tenuous and debatable cost-benefit trade-off. What makes sense would come down to the details of the case.