News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by nceqs3 on Sunday March 21, 2021 @12:41PM (#26531694)
YC Backed!
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by tpmx on Sunday March 21, 2021 @12:52PM (#26531792)
Early and with a small amount. Still, there's the brand effect...

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/718 (404)

https://blog.ycombinator.com/ubiome-yc-s14-raises-4-dollars-...

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by yumraj on Sunday March 21, 2021 @02:11PM (#26532496)
YC is a VC at a mass scale, obviously profit oriented.

They’re not angels (pun intended)

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by ic0n0cl4st on Sunday March 21, 2021 @01:13PM (#26531977)
Not too surprising. YC’s more successful companies do have a history of skirting (Uber, AirBNB).

When I worked at PagerDuty, some of the less ethical aspects of the company (like the product was initially developed while interns at Amazon) were explained to me with this phrase, verbatim:

“Paul told us to be naughty, but not too naughty.”

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by akavi on Sunday March 21, 2021 @03:39PM (#26533226)
I think most people here would agree that working on a side project in your free time using your own resources (Ie, not using your employer’s) is perfectly reasonable and hardly comparable to fraud.

(Disclaimer: happy PD employee from 2011-2015)

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by defen on Monday March 22, 2021 @01:56AM (#26537268)
> I think most people here would agree that working on a side project in your free time using your own resources (Ie, not using your employer’s) is perfectly reasonable and hardly comparable to fraud.

It's still probably against your employment agreement, especially if you work at a BigCo where just about anything computer-related could be construed to be in their line of business.

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by ic0n0cl4st on Sunday March 21, 2021 @04:03PM (#26533451)
Oh hey I know you, didn’t know you stayed so long. I think of you every time I hear the phrase “fractured fricitive”.

I remember the Amazon thing .. differently. Also some pretty shady marketing tricks, and you know, failing to protect a female employee from a predatory creep at a conference.

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by dang on Sunday March 21, 2021 @05:46PM (#26534395)
Uber wasn't funded by YC.
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by staunch on Sunday March 21, 2021 @06:45PM (#26534862)
Which doesn't say much, since this is (presumably) only the case because Uber didn't offer YC the opportunity to invest, and not because YC wouldn't have been willing to.
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by teraflop on Sunday March 21, 2021 @02:38PM (#26532726)
Don't forget about that time YC funded a smuggling ring: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8199286
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by ic0n0cl4st on Sunday March 21, 2021 @02:51PM (#26532842)
I think every traveler has this idea, explores it, realizes it is illegal and moves on.
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by refurb on Sunday March 21, 2021 @10:27PM (#26536224)
This is already a business though? Not high visibility, but there are companies that hire people to take packages on international flights. Of course it’s all above board, everything is declared, duty is paid, etc.
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by tpmx on Sunday March 21, 2021 @03:27PM (#26533128)
I guess it's a sign of a true startup person to see that while it may be illegal, it will allow growth?
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by awhitby on Monday March 22, 2021 @12:08AM (#26536765)
From http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html

4. Naughtiness

Though the most successful founders are usually good people, they tend to have a piratical gleam in their eye. They're not Goody Two-Shoes type good. Morally, they care about getting the big questions right, but not about observing proprieties. That's why I'd use the word naughty rather than evil. They delight in breaking rules, but not rules that matter. This quality may be redundant though; it may be implied by imagination.

Sam Altman of Loopt is one of the most successful alumni, so we asked him what question we could put on the Y Combinator application that would help us discover more people like him. He said to ask about a time when they'd hacked something to their advantage—hacked in the sense of beating the system, not breaking into computers. It has become one of the questions we pay most attention to when judging applications.

I believe they took that question off the application in the last few years. Perhaps “rules that matter” versus “rules that do not” turned out to be not so cut and dried.

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by michaelcampbell on Sunday March 21, 2021 @02:39PM (#26532739)
I had looked at PagerDuty in the Atlanta area because of their use of Elixir, which I would really like to explore and get good at. Is your experience there overall negative?
Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by ic0n0cl4st on Sunday March 21, 2021 @02:47PM (#26532809)
It’s been 10 years, but I would find it hard to say a good word about the founders.

My experiences there taught me that no good deed goes unpunished. I dropped out of the startup world and become a “fuck you, pay me” consultant.

Re:SF poop-testing startup, once compared to Theranos, charg... by ipsum2 on Monday March 22, 2021 @02:43AM (#26537532)
YCombinator also backed a sketchy malware startup, but Google is failing me. Does anyone remember what it was called?