It's an interesting statement, given that every example you gave is about a driver of a car about to kill a cyclist. It seems that it's the cars, or rather, the drivers, that are dangerous.

It's a common bit of dark humour in the cycling community that if you want to get away with murder, make sure the victim is riding a bike at the time.

You are supposed to respect a safe separation distance so that you don't "barely avoid crushing them" if something happen, not tailgate them. Since it happens every 3 months, consider if your driving might be at fault. If not for the cyclist, at least for the sake of not scratching your car, eh.

I also avoid driving in residential streets if I can avoid it because of kids on bikes, and I know they're crazy. I did crazy stuff on a bike as a kid, and barely survived.

“If you meet an asshole in the morning, you met an asshole.

If you meet assholes all day long, you’re the asshole”

$X are dangerous and they don't know what they are doing, they are a danger to themselves and others."

So where do we go with this line of thought? As you can see, it's not helpful in any material way. We need to make the roads safer for everyone, including other drivers. And not vilify a small (but increasing) and vulnerable portion of road users because of anecdotes.

BTW, I'm a motorist, cyclist, horse rider, old person, ex-child. So I might be biased.

Otherwise I cannot fathom how people are almost dead by your car every other month. Or aren't you following the law by holding a safe distance and a reasonable speed, perhaps?