News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What’s up with these new not-open source licenses? by _carbyau_ on Friday March 19, 2021 @12:32AM (#26510179)
Agreed. One of the issues is that from a Venn diagram or set theory point of view, all "Free Software"(by FSF definition) is "Open Source", but not all "Open Source" is "Free Software".

Yet people really only know of Open Source as a common term to describe these projects.

Re:What’s up with these new not-open source licenses? by anoncake on Friday March 19, 2021 @02:45AM (#26510644)
What software is open source but not free? The difference is a philosophical one, not one of definitions.
Re:What’s up with these new not-open source licenses? by _carbyau_ on Sunday March 21, 2021 @08:21PM (#26535417)
Uh, it is a practical one as being described in this thread.

Simply because the source is openly available to read, the licence can still say "you can read but no touchy touchy or compiling it".

While technically it doesn't stop you from actually doing this, in a court of law you'd be found to have violated the licence. So it wrecks the idea of businesses doing it, because usually the licence holder won't care unless someone is making money from it.

Free software lets you do whatever you want, but you gotta show your code. Big difference in practice, especially when it comes to running a business.

Re:What’s up with these new not-open source licenses? by anoncake on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:53AM (#26554408)
No it is not, because what you describe isn't open source.