Re:Learning Without Burnout
by nonameiguess on Tuesday March 16, 2021 @01:39PM
(#26480151)
I don't think this is the reason. They want people with no families and no responsibilities because those people will move to Seattle or San Francisco and work 100 hour weeks without having to worry about uprooting spouse and kids and ruining all human relationships.
I actually hope one of the outcomes of post-pandemic normalization of remote work is less tacit age discrimination from companies that used to greatly prefer people willing to relocate.
Re:Learning Without Burnout
by sokoloff on Tuesday March 16, 2021 @07:00PM
(#26484335)
I don’t think tacit is exactly the right word there. Effective (or de facto) is probably closer. If the company is willing to hire someone and that person decides they’re not willing to relocate, I don’t think that’s tacit age discrimination.
I actually hope one of the outcomes of post-pandemic normalization of remote work is less tacit age discrimination from companies that used to greatly prefer people willing to relocate.