News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Satellite imagery shows Northern California kelp forests ... by dahfizz on Monday March 15, 2021 @09:51AM (#26466077)
Isn't renewable energy generally cheaper than coal at this point?[1]. You're right, that we have done the work to research, develop, and manufacture renewable energy sources. Now all the rest of the world just has to buy the thing that is cheaper.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

Re:Satellite imagery shows Northern California kelp forests ... by jdmichal on Monday March 15, 2021 @12:49PM (#26468351)
Yes, renewable is cheap, but also unreliable. And storage to manage that unreliability is, per your link, more expensive than the corresponding fossil fuel plants. It's either that or drastically over-provision the renewables, which then has to be factored into the cost.

Right now, the cheapest approach from scratch could maybe consist of:

1. Over-provisioned renewables,

2. connected to a large-area grid to mitigate local-scale negative impacts to renewable productivity,

3. with enough fossil fuel capacity to basically serve as "storage" and bridge large-scale negative impacts to renewable productivity.

But, of course, China is not building from scratch -- they've been at this for decades. And the inversion of prices between renewables and fossil fuels is a fairly recent one.