News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Security.txt by nwcs on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:17PM (#26456930)
(One of the authors here)

Make sure you read through the actual latest draft (especially section 6): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-foudil-securitytxt-11

Also, we are in the end stages of the IETF approval process so this should be official later this year (if all goes well): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-foudil-securitytxt/

Re:Security.txt by geekone on Sunday March 14, 2021 @02:48PM (#26457724)
why is there no expires field on https://securitytxt.org/.well-known/security.txt
Re:Security.txt by Old_Thrashbarg on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:34PM (#26457069)
Strangely, the draft just shows up as an empty page for me in Firefox, but Chromium works fine.
Re:Security.txt by pmh on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:47PM (#26457180)
It's likely some kind of caching issue. tools.ietf.org at 4.31.198.62 responds with the draft, but 64.170.98.42 404s
Re:Security.txt by jwilk on Sunday March 14, 2021 @03:00PM (#26457826)
Re:Security.txt by dexterdog on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:41PM (#26457120)
Yes, it's throwing a 404 for me on firefox as well.
Re:Security.txt by nocman on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:42PM (#26457129)
It did that for me at first, but it was due to my impatience.

I tried again and waited, and after 10 or 15 seconds, the page finally loaded.

Re:Security.txt by mekster on Sunday March 14, 2021 @09:23PM (#26461543)
That's not impatience, the page is broken, unless your network is super slow.
Re:Security.txt by aembleton on Sunday March 14, 2021 @01:41PM (#26457124)
Same here, but the it started working once I opened Developer Tools and refreshed the page.