News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Speed of Rust vs. C. Parent comment

Re:Speed of Rust vs. C by masklinn on Saturday March 13, 2021 @12:22PM (#26448051)
> Accessing […] database content from multiple threads without proper locking, or transactions, in place will compile just fine.

All the rust db interfaces I've seen so far forbid unlocked sharing of connections, statically (the connections are !Sync, in Rust speak).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Speed of Rust vs. C by pjmlp on Saturday March 13, 2021 @12:29PM (#26448114)
They don't enforce the use of transactions, nor exclusive access to database tables.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Speed of Rust vs. C by myrrlyn on Saturday March 13, 2021 @07:37PM (#26451605)
show me a c program that does this in a manner that a rust program can't emulate
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Speed of Rust vs. C by pjmlp on Sunday March 14, 2021 @05:27AM (#26453875)
C doesn't advertise fearless concurrency.
[ Parent | on HN ]