News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by IkmoIkmo on Saturday March 13, 2021 @11:50AM (#26447779)
Different ideas about safety mostly. The US has 2x the death rate per km driven compared to Sweden.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-r...

Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by ekianjo on Saturday March 13, 2021 @02:17PM (#26449100)
The US has much larger cars so this drives fatalities up in accidents too.
Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by jefftk on Saturday March 13, 2021 @02:37PM (#26449285)
Really? An accident between two large cars is generally safer than one between two small cars.
Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by bobthepanda on Saturday March 13, 2021 @05:49PM (#26450881)
It may make collision between cars safer, but it makes collision with non-cars deadlier for the people outside the car.

The general trend for pedestrian and cycling deaths is up in the US, because increasingly popular SUVs and crossovers strike a person higher on the body, and also are more likely to push a person under the car towards the wheels or forward where they’ll be run over again, rather than over the hood.

https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/new-study-suggests-todays-s...

Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by jefftk on Saturday March 13, 2021 @06:19PM (#26451109)
I don't disagree with you, and I'm not sure why you think I do?
Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by ekianjo on Monday March 15, 2021 @05:58PM (#26469742)
Err in frontal collisions, maybe? But in pretty much every other case, having something with more kinetic energy will product more harm - it's physics after all. You don't see cyclists killing each others' a lot after all.
Re:China’s $4k electric cars tap huge market Tesla can’t reach by jefftk on Saturday March 13, 2021 @04:56PM (#26450393)