Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to...
by gmueckl on Saturday March 13, 2021 @08:29AM
(#26446414)
Self-disposing satellites are a good idea, but it's not perfect. If the control unit or the engines of the satelite fail too early during the satellite's life span, the thing will simply stick around.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to...
by dredmorbius on Saturday March 13, 2021 @11:16AM
(#26447521)
Right. And this actually is rocket surgery.
There's also the problem of retaining propellants over long periods without experiencing some negative consequence (detonation, unintended firing, volatilisation, etc).
But in general, minimising the special-handling cases would be an improvement.
Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to...
by TeMPOraL on Saturday March 13, 2021 @11:42AM
(#26447712)
Long-term propellant issue could probably be solved by using a cold-gas thruster with a non-reactive propellant - basically a pressurized gas tank welded to a valve and a nozzle. It should have enough Δv to push you into a graveyard orbit, or even deorbit straight from GEO (though that's probably dangerous, and I imagine you could see spectacular fireworks from the ground, as the satellite would be hitting the atmosphere with a couple km/s more velocity than it's typical).
Re:Myanmar's satellite held by Japan on space station due to...
by dredmorbius on Sunday March 14, 2021 @07:57PM
(#26460871)
Solid thrusters being another possibility.