Re:France grossly underestimated radioactive fallout from at...
by sjg007 on Friday March 12, 2021 @11:20PM
(#26443930)
Yeah as smart as you sound, you are wrong.
Why don't you read:
https://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Publications/ADA%20News/File...
before you spout nonsense.
Re:France grossly underestimated radioactive fallout from at...
by jessaustin on Saturday March 13, 2021 @12:03AM
(#26444115)
I'm not going to read all 29 pages at this hour, but the chart on page 5 clearly indicates that patients with teeth should be getting 4BW every 2-3 years at the longest.
Note: if a dentist or hygienist notices something, it doesn't matter if you had FMX or pano 3 months ago. Getting another BW or PA can make the difference between a tiny filling and lots of discomfort.
Re:France grossly underestimated radioactive fallout from at...
by redis_mlc on Friday March 12, 2021 @10:07PM
(#26443537)
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but extractions can be cheaper and more effective than root canals, fillings, and crowns.
If you have a tooth with only 2 roots and one of them cracks, then it's better to just remove the tooth. Besides chronic infection that can hemorrhage, it will have to be extracted within 5 years anyway.
With 3 roots and only one cracked, sometimes dental surgeons can do something.
Also, the comment about dental x-rays being a profit center are clearly true. In SV, it's like they put you on a calendar for them, and they're usually done before an exam.
You're saving money at both ends! Not only are you not buying X-rays, but it's also fairly likely that by the time a condition is serious enough to cause you pain, the only option left will be to pull the tooth. Extractions are definitely cheaper than fancy procedures like root canals, fillings, and crowns. At some point you might have no teeth remaining, and you won't have to worry about the issue at all!
Modern dental x-rays involve minuscule radiation levels.