News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by vinniejames on Thursday March 11, 2021 @04:37PM (#26429308)
Alternatively, this could be achieved by an affirmative action on the grantor's side. For example, require a signed transaction from a particular wallet every X months, if no transaction occurs, then trigger the switch
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by kfichter on Thursday March 11, 2021 @04:51PM (#26429464)
My favorite version of this is having a list of beneficiary addresses that can request to have access to the funds; you can cancel the request at any time within some time period. No fancy token required. I built a demo of this a while back: https://github.com/smartcontracts/dead-x-wallet
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by fastball on Thursday March 11, 2021 @05:44PM (#26429969)
Yeah, I think the problem with this is that you need some way to store data without anyone being able to read the data on the blockchain.

There must be a middle-ground between your solution (dead simple) and the OP, which I find to be overly complex with all the "Curse", "Archeologist", etc. shenanigans.

Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by qqii on Thursday March 11, 2021 @06:34PM (#26430424)
Public key cryptography and using the same platform (https://www.arweave.org/) would do.
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by fastball on Thursday March 11, 2021 @07:12PM (#26430703)
But where do you store the private key?
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by qqii on Thursday March 18, 2021 @09:50PM (#26509476)
The private key is the dead-x-wallet contract.
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by qqii on Thursday March 11, 2021 @06:45PM (#26430502)
I wonder what the gas costs are in comparison, contact deployment is reasonable expensive. I wonder if that's why they modeled it this way.
Re:A Decentralized Dead Man’s Switch by qqii on Thursday March 11, 2021 @06:28PM (#26430367)
This is exactly what is proposed, the signed transaction is just a transaction as all transactions are signed.