News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Write site-specific extensions to replace sites' JavaScript code. Parent comment

Re:Write site-specific extensions to replace sites' JavaScri... by elastolin on Thursday March 11, 2021 @04:12PM (#26429067)
We both know there's about a 100% chance that whoever reads gnu.org and writes a browser extension to block JavaScript on a specific site is a male, so "he/him" is better in this case.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Write site-specific extensions to replace sites' JavaScri... by anoncake on Thursday March 11, 2021 @05:05PM (#26429616)
We all know that the chance is not 100%. Maybe it's 90%, maybe it's 99.9999%, it doesn't matter: It isn't 100% so he and him are plain wrong.

I do think neopronouns are silly when used like this but silly is better than wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]