Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by moscovium on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @09:40PM
(#26419544)
Is it not the goal of a headline to engage?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by JasonFruit on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @09:43PM
(#26419561)
Yes, but not at the cost of accuracy.
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by site-packages1 on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @09:45PM
(#26419582)
But multiple headlines can both be accurate with one being more engaging. These aren't mutually exclusive.
Article about a bank robbery:
"First National Bank Robbed"
"Gunmen Rob First National Bank in Daring Robbery"
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by AareyBaba on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @09:56PM
(#26419660)
My favorite this year was from the Times of India on the Jan 6th US capital insurrection.
"Coup Klux Klan: Don triggers mob & rob bid"
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by johncena33 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @12:06AM
(#26420487)
That doesn't mean what OP has mentioned is wrong. NYT has a history of misleading headlines [1].
[1] https://thepostmillennial.com/nyt-makes-terrorism-story-into...
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by solarkraft on Wednesday March 10, 2021 @10:28PM
(#26419846)
"Engaging" while being highly irritating. The first one is concise.
Re:Investigating how the New York Times A/B tests their head...
by penetraitor69 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @01:43AM
(#26421030)
True, but which is more likely to get your click: a headline you're indifferent to, or a headline that fills you with righteous indignation? I think that if there's one thing that the development of social media has taught us about human nature, it's that any emotion is better than boredom, from an engagement standpoint.