Most well-credentialed people would.
Most under-credentialed people are thankful for skills-based testing because it levels the playing field.
I'd like a way to prove my skills once, rather than with every interview I have. I bet CS grads would as well. The interview process is just so... tedious. And in a field where you get significantly more money by changing jobs, that's a problem.
It's a market inefficiency imo - people get stuck in jobs where they aren't paid enough for at least some amount of time. People can't hire new employees quickly because the process takes forever. I've been on both sides of the interview process many times and it's extremely inefficient on both sides. We're developers... this should be streamlined and automated.
In comparison, software has no equivalent credentials. Universities, collages and bootcamps have no incentive to fail anyone. As a result plenty of weak students pass - only to discover that they’re largely unemployable. This does a disservice to lots of people - companies can’t trust degrees, and need expensive interviews. Good candidates have no way to reliably demonstrate their strengths. And weak students waste tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars and years of their lives failing to learn to code.
But the benefit of our system is that we allow programmers to be self taught. If you can’t afford to go to collage, or you are from a poor country, or you just don’t like school, that’s no barrier. You can learn programming in your own time and still get a great job. There’s lots of great programmers with the aptitude to become lawyers or doctors - but who would never be able to get the piece of paper they need to get those jobs. That’s something we as an industry should be proud of.