I'd say I'm under-credentialed. I don't have a CS degree.
I'd like a way to prove my skills once, rather than with every interview I have. I bet CS grads would as well. The interview process is just so... tedious. And in a field where you get significantly more money by changing jobs, that's a problem.
It's a market inefficiency imo - people get stuck in jobs where they aren't paid enough for at least some amount of time. People can't hire new employees quickly because the process takes forever. I've been on both sides of the interview process many times and it's extremely inefficient on both sides. We're developers... this should be streamlined and automated.
Re:The technical interview practice gap
by the_only_law on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @08:27PM
(#26406719)
Not only that, but isn't law a field where the quality of the jobs you can get is dependent on the prestige of the school you went to? I.e. you wont ever get a job at a top firm with a law degree from University of State
Most well-credentialed people would.
Most under-credentialed people are thankful for skills-based testing because it levels the playing field.