News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by Symbiote on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:08AM (#26397644)
There is a long history of white people assuming white people are more intelligent.

When you meet a software developer, saying they're unexpectedly dark strongly implies you didn't think someone of that ethnicity was capable of being a software developer.

It doesn't need to be spelled out -- the implication is very clear, and if an employee claims to be ignorant of this, they should at least be sent on the race awareness training.

Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by aurbano on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:38AM (#26397873)
The first time I meet a remote colleague I'm often surprised by their height, and a very common statement is "Wow I never realised you were this tall!"

I don't see the difference between that and realising someone is a different ethnicity than you expected.

Racism is (by definition) prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism. Being surprised because someone looks different than you imagined is nothing like that.

Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by gjulianm on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @07:41AM (#26398244)
> I'm often surprised by their height

Because they're of an unusual height, I assume. You had an expectation that they were of average height.

You can look at the pictures of the person that received that comment. They don't have an unusual skin color, and the ethnicity matches their name (say, they don't have a Russian sounding name with really dark, almost black skin). It shouldn't be unexpected to see their skin color.

Another option is that the expectation didn't come from averages nor names, and it came from prejudice about how software engineers look like. So yes, it definitely can be interpreted as a racist remark.

Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by inglor_cz on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @07:45AM (#26398260)
Perhaps they had a bad camera.

My color of skin definitely depends on the camera I sit in front of. The best cameras are as good as a mirror, but lower quality cameras built in laptops are awful. Looking at greenish or greyish myself is a bit nauseating.

Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by simmerup on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:58AM (#26397986)
Clearly you're implying they should be playing basketball and have no business being in whatever career they're in
Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by wrren on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:53AM (#26397955)
You're leaping to an incredibly negative assumption of the speaker's intent, and then onto a form of punishment for that person. I think the "assume good intent" approach is more appropriate in these kinds of situations where it's incredibly ambiguous.
Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by inglor_cz on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @06:24AM (#26397770)
"strongly implies", "the implication is very clear"

"Assume the worst" = This is precisely the kind of mind reading that leads to a paranoid, unhappy, eternally vigilant society.

Re:Google HR 'suggested medical leave' for racism victims by d0100 on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @10:06PM (#26407286)
> saying they're unexpectedly dark strongly implies you didn't think someone of that ethnicity was capable of being a software developer.

Everything is blue if you wear blue tinted glasses

I live in a city where I expect everyone to be expectedly dark, and anyone that come near to my white shade is very unexpectedly light

If I go to the pale end of the country, any darker skin would be unexpected, no matter the job title and no matter the IQ level

No unexpecting person should be liable for your projected meaning on surprising turn of events