> Durable products are not something that any of Musk's companies are known for

Starlink is not Tesla, and from my study of the /r/starlink subreddit, there have not been any significant complaints about the dish reliability, even in the bitter snow and cold

That's precisely the argument I heard from Nokia die-hards when they iPhone was introduced :-)

This isn't a Nokia vs iPhone situation.

Shipping already does everything that Starlink proponents claim Starlink will enable, i.e., track ships, track cargo, track temperatures in containers. And this data isn't like video, so you don't need a lot of bandwidth for it.

Starlink might make things cheaper than current satellite communications offerings, but this is evolutionary not revolutionary.

In another thread, someone suggested Viasat was costing between $20k and $50k per month.

On a ocean going cargo ship, that is not that much relative to the other costs.

And my blackberry could already run apps, browse the web, and send quick messages to each other years before the iphone.

To be fair, your iphone doesn't really do anything interesting past what your blackberry did. It's mostly network effects, which used to exist for blackberries and now exist for smartphones. What they're used for by most people is almost indistinguishable from what they used to be used for.

Not the same apps, though. In this comparison, it would be "my blackberry already runs iOS apps, but they're a bit slower than the new iphone".

Improvement for sure, and I'd bet on StarLink making a lot of money on this by volume, but it's not going to radically change shipping.

Funny, I've just gone back to a Nokia.

No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.