News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by dang on Sunday March 07, 2021 @07:24PM (#26381118)
I think you're underestimating the ability of HN readers to figure things out. Perhaps that is the answer to both questions.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by endisneigh on Sunday March 07, 2021 @07:31PM (#26381151)
For what it’s worth I agree with the parent comment. This is the only forum I’ve ever seen where moderators are not clearly labeled as such.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by hombre_fatal on Sunday March 07, 2021 @08:08PM (#26381363)
But you never present how that’s a problem. You’d be succumbing to the ancient forum pastime of hypothetical rules/scenarios lawyering where you confuse the ability to invent a scenario (someone not knowing dang is a mod for 60seconds and that’s worth worrying about for unsaid reason) with the need to change the forum.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by beaconstudios on Sunday March 07, 2021 @07:58PM (#26381317)
fwiw, it's just dang as far as I'm aware.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by brudgers on Sunday March 07, 2021 @07:59PM (#26381318)
Curious are there other more significant differences?
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by bordercases on Sunday March 07, 2021 @08:43PM (#26381550)
This equivalent of "RTFM" is a hostile percept for communication, as it implies that it is right to hide or obfuscate relevant information so that the speaker has less of a job to do when producing clear speech.

There are benefits to "RTFM". They may involve making sure there are shared assumptions during speech that allow further speech to be economized equitably between speaker and receiver. They may involve the internalization of the structure of a model so that they it be applied fluently in some practical setting. Your suggestion fails to satisfy either condition as the cost is either inequitable, or the benefit is irrelevant.

Putting a tag that says "moderator" next to a username is such a cheap quality of life improvement that even if what you claim is true, it really shouldn't be the job of the audience to figure anything out in the first place, as by comparison, it looks like a strong disfavor.

Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by justin66 on Sunday March 07, 2021 @09:37PM (#26381834)
> it really shouldn't be the job of the audience to figure anything out in the first place

Words to avoid living by.

Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by bordercases on Monday March 08, 2021 @12:45AM (#26382631)
Things can be made endlessly complicated, or absolutely simple. So it's better to lean towards simplicity as one can converge towards minimal confusion.
Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by dang on Sunday March 07, 2021 @11:30PM (#26382298)
Oh I don't agree. I think there are downsides to putting a 'mod' tag beside usernames, quite strong downsides actually, in addition to the upside that you guys are correctly noting. It's a tradeoff. I'm glad that I listened to my intuition 7 years ago (ack) when I became responsible for HN, and chose to trust the way things had always functioned here.

I don't see this as RTFM; there's no FM to begin with, other than perhaps https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html.

Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by gist on Monday March 08, 2021 @01:54PM (#26389903)
> Oh I don't agree. I think there are downsides to putting a 'mod' tag beside usernames, quite strong downsides actually

What are those 'downsides....quite strong downsides actually'?

Re:Popular YouTubers who are building their own sites by dang on Tuesday March 09, 2021 @03:33PM (#26403786)
It would change the feeling in the community. It would introduce barriers in communication that would make it harder to relate. It would fuck with the psychology of both moderators and non-moderators, the same way that uniforms do. It would turn the mods into abstractions/roles rather than human beings. It would infect HN with that priggish approach to authority which appeals to the smallminded and depresses creativity. It would signal lack of trust. It would demoralize any moderator who didn't have the soul of a meter maid.