News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by Gatsky on Saturday March 06, 2021 @06:55PM (#26371701)
I find Weinstein very irritating. This whole GU thing is just another example. It is the typical mix of “I have discovered the extremely important X, the establishment is oppressing me.” So far X has included a theory of everything, a conspiracy by academia to keep wages low, a nobel prize worthy discovery by his brother on mouse models and a nobel prize worthy economic theory he helped his wife develop. He had some good stuff on his podcast sure but it just isn’t worth the effort when it is interspersed with these self-aggrandising narratives. I also question his motives when he quit recording his podcast for no reason despite talking about how lucrative it was (?) and going on and on about the importance of the community he was building, and the ‘distributed idea suppression complex’ which his podcast was supposed to combat.
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by a1369209993 on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:22PM (#26371860)
> So far X has included a theory of everything, a conspiracy by academia to keep wages low, a nobel prize worthy discovery by his brother on mouse models and a nobel prize worthy economic theory he helped his wife develop.

He's basically a anti-authority (/anti-expert/?) a la Alex Jones in [0]. Weinstein has been full of shit enough in the past that him claiming something is, absent any other evidence, evidence that the claim is false.

0: https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/05/28/bush-did-north-dakota/

Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by arduanika on Sunday March 07, 2021 @09:14AM (#26375973)
Independent of this heated discussion, thanks for this good & interesting link.
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by mgamache on Saturday March 06, 2021 @06:58PM (#26371727)
I am glad the merit of ideas are proportional to the likeability of the author.
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by threatofrain on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:09PM (#26371781)
Intellectual transparency is part of the likeability of an author. Part of being intellectually transparent is elucidating your reasoning for external examination.

The density of self-promotion also affects the likeability of an author, and is part of signal to noise ratio.

Weinstein has been far less forthcoming than Mochizuki, but he has already gotten far better treatment, and Mochizuki is an actual career mathematician. [1]

One can view intellectualism as an activity of moving things around your head, and being correct in your own little world. Or one can view intellectualism as an activity of contributing to the cultural tapestry of knowledge. Regardless of merit, perhaps one of these positions is more likeable than the other.

[1]: https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=12220

Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by SurfingToad on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:02PM (#26371746)
As opposed to, you know, providing proof for your claims?
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by ryan93 on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:01PM (#26371739)
Are you saying you buy Weinsteins claims?
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by mgamache on Saturday March 06, 2021 @07:03PM (#26371757)
I am saying GP's "I find Weinstein very irritating" is a non sequitur.
Re:Problems with Eric Weinstein's “Geometric Unity” by akvadrako on Sunday March 07, 2021 @04:17AM (#26374419)
So what? I think discussing Eric Weinstein's presentation style is closely on topic.