The major questions of biology have already been solved, though. The rest is filling in the details.
This doesn’t seem to be true at least for the nervous and immune systems. Probably also the microbiome we host. There’s lots of important stuff yet to be learned with those systems.
Re:Myths about how the brain works
by nescioquid on Thursday March 04, 2021 @05:46PM
(#26349573)
I read the parent's comment in terms of how we once viewed life being mysterious, talking about the "elan vital" before we understood DNA. This is often used as an analogy to our current struggle to understand consciousness.
My above comment was not ironic. What I meant is that we have already discovered the algorithm that gives rise to all biological phenomena: Evolution by Natural Selection.
We also have some grand principles that further unite the field, like the cell as the basic unit of organismal life, emergent properties of higher order systems, &c.
The remaining work is mostly 'stamp collecting' - looking at the details of the output of that algorithm. Of course those details are enormously complex. Kind of like mapping out the Mandlebrot Set after you already know the algorithm.
Well the stamp collecting is where the action is.
If you wanna cure cancer, resolve chronic diseases, conserve ecosystems under climate change, etc.
It’s cool to know that DNA exists and that life evolves by natural selection, but getting into the complex weeds of that fractal is where we discover that we know so little.
Re:Myths about how the brain works
by lotsofpulp on Thursday March 04, 2021 @04:34PM
(#26348698)
What? This very thread is about an article talking about the lack of accuracy in our model of the brain's mechanisms.
Re:Myths about how the brain works
by TuringTest on Friday March 05, 2021 @03:30AM
(#26354356)
I suspect GP agrees with you and is making fun of what this guy[1] said to Plank.
Re:Myths about how the brain works
by TuringTest on Friday March 05, 2021 @03:28AM
(#26354342)
Famous last words of some biologist? :-P
We tend to give the impression that we’ve figured almost everything out, and so you’re just learning the facts of it all.
Really, we’ve carved out a little island in a sea of ignorance, and the foundations of the island are just our current best rough approximations that might collapse.
An example from the field I’m in — biology. It’s quite likely that if you worked at it you can describe a new species in your backyard. You don’t have to go to the Amazon rainforest, there’s scientific unknowns all around you all the time.