Well, it depends on your breadth of understanding of the issue. If you have a limited scope, it doesn't seem like a big problem. And it also assumes that we all agree on certain basic human rights. If we don't then yes, it is a matter of perspective.
Read "Weapons of Math Destruction". It discusses how existing algorithms discriminate in the following case-studies:
- courtroom sentencing (and recidivism prediction)
- mortgage and loan rate determination
- educator performance
- job applications that use 3rd party screening tools
The book looks at specific examples of where these black-box algorithms are deployed that have ruined people's lives with no accountability. The ethics concerns that are being raised were needed a decade ago, or more, but it is only getting worse with the ad-hoc deployment of this un-baked technology to almost every industry.
I have to stress again that these black-box algorithms are ALREADY IN USE and cannot be subpoenaed by courts because it is considered intellectual property.
So yes, it is urgent to crack open this technology because it is all too easily being sold without any investigation, accountability, or thought to the consequences. "Move fast and break things" doesn't work if it ruins peoples lives by landing them in jail, or pushing them into poverty.
The book demonstrates this is not a what-if strawman, but reality.
Just as easy as putting the baby back in. It would be more constructive to work on ways to detect and reduce harm.
To follow your analogy, it is more like, "wear a damn condom and take a sex-ed class before having an unwanted baby."