News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Whole Web Pays for Google and Facebook to Be Free by gregshap on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @08:53AM (#26328284)
I would pay more for a subset of the current NYT. The website is full of imo prominently displayed clickbait that I consider negative value.

I'm a previous subscriber of NYT and Bloomberg online. I've kept my WSJ subscription partly because its easier to consume only the useful content.

I also subscribe to a couple of email lists where the author absolutely provides value in their niche over and above the larger newsrooms. They are usually great complements to each other and it tells you something that the journalists are also reading the newsletters.

Re:The Whole Web Pays for Google and Facebook to Be Free by daveguy on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @09:36AM (#26328814)
I feel the same way. I stopped my NYT subscription because of "native ads"... Aka, paid advertising content posing as a news story by the outlet. I will not support deceitful ad placement. Subscriptions or ads. Pick one. No native ads.
Re:The Whole Web Pays for Google and Facebook to Be Free by tekdude on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @11:17AM (#26330415)
> The website is full of imo prominently displayed clickbait that I consider negative value.

When checking the New York Times, I prefer to look at the "Today's Paper" list of headlines, it's much easier to parse and less clickbaity: https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper

Same for the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/todays_paper/updates/