Re:Python 3.10.0a6 is available, now with 100% more pattern ...
by collyw on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @05:38AM
(#26326771)
Depends no? If your "100%" is based on the after value rather than the before value, you have added 100%. Though I guess there is an implicit expectation that it is the before value that is used.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Python 3.10.0a6 is available, now with 100% more pattern ...
by yakubin on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @07:40AM
(#26327576)
> Though I guess there is an implicit expectation that it is the before value that is used.
This is what people normally learn in primary school about the meaning of this phrase.
Re:Python 3.10.0a6 is available, now with 100% more pattern ...
by budafish on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @05:56AM
(#26326866)
I think the word "more" implied it was 100% on top of the existing.
Re:Python 3.10.0a6 is available, now with 100% more pattern ...
by mckirk on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @06:32AM
(#26327077)
Yes, that's what we have now though, isn't it?
It went from having 0 pattern matching to having 1 pattern matching -- that seems like '100% more of this thing we are talking about' to me. This of course only makes sense if you see '1 pattern matching' as a precisely defined abstract construct, but I guess the 100%-more joke usually requires that perspective (and is a joke precisely because it's so non-sensical to think this way).