News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some Were Meant For C (2017) [pdf] by nineteen999 on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @03:57AM (#26313301)
May or not eventually be true, but your response as per usual wholly misses the point and is irrelevant.
Re:Some Were Meant For C (2017) [pdf] by pjmlp on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @08:18AM (#26314960)
And as usual some people get up on their nerves and feel like answering irrelevant comments instead of moving on.
Re:Some Were Meant For C (2017) [pdf] by nineteen999 on Tuesday March 02, 2021 @05:06PM (#26321659)
I'm not the slightest bit unnerved by your comment. But if you feel like answering the original question I posed then I'm all ears.

Even if I indulge your fantasy for a moment - Linux (amongst other systems) has provided myself and many others with a solid career for the better part of the last 25 years, daily security patches from vendors and all, and I don't see any solid evidence of that changing before I retire.

Further I suggest most Linux people would be able to adapt if the world were to move on to an improved competitor with enough momentum to be adopted en masse - which hasn't happened.

Re:Some Were Meant For C (2017) [pdf] by pjmlp on Wednesday March 03, 2021 @03:18AM (#26325954)
That has nothing to do with its technical capabilities, rather a free beer UNIX clone, that is all.