Re:Sir Kazuo Ishiguro warns of young authors self-censoring ...
by dragonwriter on Monday March 01, 2021 @07:38PM
(#26310483)
> In firing her the company is complicit in casting her as racist
No, in firing her the company is complicit in furthering the idea that the duty of a PR representative to their employer is to have and exercise good judgement when it regards public relations for the firm.
Re:Sir Kazuo Ishiguro warns of young authors self-censoring ...
by mc32 on Monday March 01, 2021 @07:46PM
(#26310534)
That’s an ex-post excuse. They got blowback from her attempt at exposing people’s preconceptions. They didn’t like it. They caved in to the mob. PR isn’t perfect. They make mistakes judging public reaction to comms for their clients. Unless it’s super bad, they don’t lose their jobs in public. There was no opportunity fir her to explain her side. Nope. Hot potato.
Companies burry all kinds of misdeeds for their staff. So it’s not at all congruent.
Re:Sir Kazuo Ishiguro warns of young authors self-censoring ...
by dragonwriter on Monday March 01, 2021 @07:52PM
(#26310577)
> They got blowback from her attempt at exposing people’s preconceptions. They didn’t like it.
Yes, “actions that produced blowback that the company doesn't like” are the definition of a PR failure. When PR is your whole job, that's a big deal.
> Companies burry all kinds of misdeeds for their staff
You can't bury it when it is public and tied to both the employee and the company from the outset.
In firing her the company is complicit in casting her as racist when her sarcasm was pointed at low brow racism. But that escaped the shamers and cancellors. They were too busy frothing at the mouth.