I don't understand why so many people assume that others should pay for the services they consume.

Why should a relatively poor upstate new york taxpayer be paying 50% of the fare of some young finance bro going to work?

Also removing prices removes information. For instance the ferry costs something like $15 per rider to operate compared to around $5 for subway. With both trips at the same price to the consumer, you make the marginal rider indifferent to the two in terms of price where it would be beneficial to have that information to save money and divert resources to the more effective mode

I don't think the flow of money is from Upstate NY to NYC. And to take your example to it's logical conclusion, we'd end up in an AnCap paradise. Why should I pay for ANY socialized good or service that I don't use. Such as roads to places I'll never go, schools my child doesn't attend, and medical procedures that I don't need?

Size is important in that regard. I have less of an issue paying for socialized goods on a local level than I do at a much larger level. I'm willing to help a neighbor out, but less willing to help out someone on the other side of the earth. Local level is also more transparent and the officials in charge are more likely to be held responsible. I have more access to my mayor than I do my governor.

> roads to places I'll never go

Gasoline tax and toll roads are a good way of linking those who benefit to those who provide the good.

> schools my child doesn't attend

A lot of people move out of high tax neighborhoods when their kids graduate high school. I don't think school should be tied to real-estate anyway because it creates really perverse dynamics (people without money end up going to the worse funded schools). So that model doesn't exactly work well right now

> medical procedures that I don't need

I buy health insurance voluntarily and gladly pay for medical procedures that I don't need on the off chance that I need an expensive medical procedure in the future

After all, why should the city dweller pay for the roads being used by the upstate new yorker?

Right, the better estimate of how economical transit lines are would be fares + gain in property value from the presence of the lines. (Or, to get the units right, fares/year + gain in locational rental value/year.)

Or to look at it another way: assume some genie offered to dismantle the NYC train/subway system for free. Assume you're the government and only care about maximizing revenue. Would that be a good deal? Of course not, even if the system wasn't self-sustaining from fares.

Imagine if the trucking industry had to absorb the cost of the roads they damage.

Don’t they already do that through more expensive registration fees? “Apportioned” and (sometimes) commercial plates cost more than Joe Shmoe driving a Civic.

No, they don't pay anywhere near enough. https://truecostblog.com/2009/06/02/the-hidden-trucking-indu...