News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by Blikkentrekker on Sunday February 28, 2021 @05:24PM (#26297686)
And no one has done this before?

Methinks that building this chain by trial and error is rather trivial compared to the actual work in building a compiler.

Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by qqii on Sunday February 28, 2021 @07:57PM (#26298651)
Guix performed the bootstrap from mrustc 0.8 for rust 1.19 all the way to rust 1.28 in 2018: https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2018/bootstrapping-rust/

Since them they've bootstrapped this all the way to 1.50: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages...

The work done here is non trivial, this chain of versions are required for the final binary to be reproducible.

Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by sanxiyn on Sunday February 28, 2021 @05:32PM (#26297736)
We are discussing mrustc here. The reason it hasn't been done yet is that nearly everyone interested in this agrees mrustc is a better bootstrapping path than starting from the last OCaml version.
Re:mrustc: In-progress alternative Rust compiler (to C) by Blikkentrekker on Sunday February 28, 2021 @06:04PM (#26297946)
That it's a better bootstrapping process for the user has no relationship with the ease of development for the developer.

Typically, they are inversely correlated.