News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rust, Zig, and the Futility of “Replacing” C. Parent comment

Re:Rust, Zig, and the Futility of “Replacing” C by ghoward on Sunday February 28, 2021 @10:24AM (#26293979)
For why I used bc, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26293876 .

For masks, see https://gavinhoward.com/2020/08/masks-and-carbon-dioxide/ and https://gavinhoward.com/2020/08/in-science-all-factors-matte... . In essence, those who claim that masks work might be right, but they also ignore other factors that, if considered, might show that masks are worse for us overall.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust, Zig, and the Futility of “Replacing” C by adamnemecek on Sunday February 28, 2021 @12:11PM (#26294846)
Your models don’t agree with experimental data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust, Zig, and the Futility of “Replacing” C by ghoward on Sunday February 28, 2021 @12:27PM (#26295024)
They don't agree with _some_ experimental data, but yes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust, Zig, and the Futility of “Replacing” C by adamnemecek on Sunday February 28, 2021 @12:39PM (#26295137)
Show me experimental data that they agree with.
[ Parent | on HN ]