News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by II2II on Sunday February 28, 2021 @07:55AM (#26293069)
While I agree that de Raadt sounds bitter, I also agree with the sentiment. When I look at the software development scene these days (may it be compilers or libraries) it genuinely feels like there is more advocacy than substance.

I am not going to blame Rust for that. Rust is a language I have been meaning to look into and they have a need to be heard over the ruckus. Yet the preponderance of propaganda begs the question: is this real or is it going to be yet another language that fails to reflect the claims? While learning something new is wonderful, I would rather expend my energy on a language that has something genuinely interesting to offer.

Re:Theo de Raadt 'Re: new: lang/zig' by k__ on Sunday February 28, 2021 @08:23AM (#26293246)
There is no substance for most of it.

But taking Rust as example?

Rust is the one language that delivered in terms of performance and safety.