In Defense of Myers Briggs (2020)

Re:In Defense of Myers Briggs (2020) by rewgs on Sunday February 28, 2021 @12:45AM (#26290990)

I’ve gotten downvoted every time I’ve come to the defense of Meyers Briggs on HN, so I’m happy to see a comment with more or less my view of it voted to the top for once.

I find it to be an extremely useful abstraction. Being honest with myself and really digging into how the cognitive functions “work” has been incredibly instructive and valuable in terms of further understanding myself. It’s a REALLY high level programming language, so if you want memory management, so to speak, you’ll be disappointed. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t valuable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In Defense of Myers Briggs (2020) by anotherfish on Sunday February 28, 2021 @03:41AM (#26291717)

You probably hit the wrong "bubble". This happens. Then there's the various groupthink fashions that come and go like weather patterns on various comment sites. I doubt HN is much different. Probably better on HN but I've seen some oddball voting patterns around BLM and similar.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:In Defense of Myers Briggs (2020) by bigfudge on Sunday February 28, 2021 @03:24AM (#26291664)

This analogy breaks down though. High level languages can be slow or inefficient because they don’t map directly into reality, but they are still correct. MBTI and FFI just don’t really work at all ... they don’t predict much and if you took them too seriously as permanent traits you would make bad decisions.

[ Parent | on HN ]