Re:Wi-LE: Can WiFi replace Bluetooth? (2019) [pdf]
by dinero_rojo on Saturday February 27, 2021 @06:50PM
(#26289285)
At least read the abstract before commenting, man...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wi-LE: Can WiFi replace Bluetooth? (2019) [pdf]
by jnurmine on Saturday February 27, 2021 @06:57PM
(#26289316)
I did, man.
Table 1.
Wi-Le Energy/packet: 84 uJ
Wi-Le Idle current: 2.5 uA
BLE Energy/packet: 71 uJ
BLE Idle current: 1.1 uA
You can see this from Figure 4 as well.So, like I wrote, Bluetooth consumes less battery.
In addition there are unsolved issues, which are likely to add to the overall consumption.
Edit: formatting
Re:Wi-LE: Can WiFi replace Bluetooth? (2019) [pdf]
by theta_d on Saturday February 27, 2021 @08:02PM
(#26289711)
> We believe that an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementation will have much lower power consumption.
Line from right above the table so it could possibly go the other direction and use less.