News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook is pushing back on Apple’s new iPhone privacy rules by jb775 on Friday February 26, 2021 @02:34PM (#26278863)
I'm skeptical as well considering Apple selectively leaves gaping holes depending on levels of public knowledge (e.g. talk a big game on encryption, but don't encrypt iCloud backups while using dark patterns nudging users towards using iCloud backups).

This is definitely good for privacy in the short term, but long term will depend on if Apple decides to monetize this data themselves.

Re:Facebook is pushing back on Apple’s new iPhone privacy rules by j16sdiz on Saturday February 27, 2021 @02:18AM (#26283306)
Most of iCloud backups are encrypted with your PIN — the one you unlock your phone. Some more sensitive data are backup only if you choose backup locally
Re:Facebook is pushing back on Apple’s new iPhone privacy rules by zepto on Friday February 26, 2021 @10:33PM (#26282363)
The don’t collect this data. How could they monetize it?
Re:Facebook is pushing back on Apple’s new iPhone privacy rules by jb775 on Saturday February 27, 2021 @03:54AM (#26283594)
iPhone users must login to use the phone. Those users need to provide valid identification info considering the phone is linked to their phone service account. Combine that with apple defining every single action the phone takes, they could easily flip a switch to start collecting "anonymized" data.

Or they could simply update the data-sharing default to "Yes" and 75%+ would never disable it.

Re:Facebook is pushing back on Apple’s new iPhone privacy rules by zepto on Saturday February 27, 2021 @10:32AM (#26285447)
I said.

> The don’t collect this data. How could they monetize it?

Your answer is essentially -

“in principle they could build tracking into all their software”

You seem to be suggesting that their plan is to fein interest in privacy to undermine all the tracking companies first, and then reverse their stance and become a super-intrusive tracking company.

That seems very far fetched and weirdly conspiracy like.

Also obviously not true, given that they have been lobbying for privacy legislation.