Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are...
by darkwizard42 on Friday February 26, 2021 @06:38PM
(#26281146)
Yeah but you are conflating the "tagline" with the full message.
By that regard, you aren't buying Apples, you are buying "Golden Delicious Apples certified organic by the State of California and could contain random chemical that might cause cancer to you"
Still apples, but now you question whether they are truly edible or safe, which you used to assume about all apples
Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are...
by newsbinator on Saturday February 27, 2021 @02:10AM
(#26283285)
In that analogy, it would be buying apples, but they only taste like apples. Underneath they’re oranges and always have been, and the little sticker on them says “Apple-seeming oranges”, so the consumer should have known.
Re:Judge in Google case disturbed that 'incognito' users are...
by vinger on Friday February 26, 2021 @01:34PM
(#26278102)
When it came out it was don't save cookies so I can't be tracked.
Now that it is known google can track you outside of stored cookies it should probably be relabelled to no persistant cookies mode and leave the idea of incognito. Using that word makes it seem like you are using tor.
"You've gone incognito" doesn't mean what it says on the tin.
It means "You've gone incognito... from other users of this computer, not from us. From us you're still plenty cognito."