Re:Google admits Kubernetes container tech is too complex
by jaywalk on Friday February 26, 2021 @10:57AM
(#26276042)
I've got relatively modestly-specced SQL Servers handling tables with hundreds of millions and even billions of rows without breaking a sweat. Somebody either just really wanted a new toy to play with, or has no idea what indexes are.
Re:Google admits Kubernetes container tech is too complex
by Guest42 on Friday February 26, 2021 @11:06AM
(#26276185)
Exactly, I’ve seen Sql servers handle billions of rows with 2 thousand columns. I think also people that work too long at one company don’t realize how problems were solved elsewhere.
Re:Google admits Kubernetes container tech is too complex
by eloff on Friday February 26, 2021 @09:15AM
(#26274938)
> I’ve also seen a switch from rdbms to Hadoop because a company had “millions” of rows. Luckily on this one I only had to rewrite a handful of queries.
Wat. That's gross. It probably costs them more per query now than the rdbms did.
Re:Google admits Kubernetes container tech is too complex
by Guest42 on Friday February 26, 2021 @11:07AM
(#26276209)
Didn’t even think about that part because I don’t know too much about Hadoop other than it seemed impractical.
Re:Google admits Kubernetes container tech is too complex
by yellow_lead on Friday February 26, 2021 @10:28AM
(#26275687)
I guess millions sounded like a lot to a decision maker :)
I’ve also seen a switch from rdbms to Hadoop because a company had “millions” of rows. Luckily on this one I only had to rewrite a handful of queries.