Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by apahwa on Thursday February 25, 2021 @01:35AM
(#26260332)
can you name a business that is completely unrelated to Apple or Amazon and would not see significant benefits from being absorbed?
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by zaphirplane on Thursday February 25, 2021 @01:58AM
(#26260435)
For apple :- a farm, cattle station, cement factory, brick maker, carpets, upholstery, chicken farm the list goes on
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by read_if_gay_ on Thursday February 25, 2021 @03:10AM
(#26260777)
Introducing Apple Chicken.
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by tshanmu on Thursday February 25, 2021 @05:27AM
(#26261554)
New improved version, only gives you the runs if you eat it holding the wrong way....
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by fzil on Thursday February 25, 2021 @06:19PM
(#26269625)
imagine having to go to the genius bar to get your chicken cooked the right way
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by lmm on Thursday February 25, 2021 @02:09AM
(#26260501)
The way I'd think about it is "would that business put any time into a partnership with Apple/Amazon if the chance came up". I guess you could argue that any business above a certain size would consider them worth talking to for some kind of cross-promotional deal even if that doesn't make a lot of sense on the face of it - Caterpillar? Hilton? But I think small focused companies outside of Apple/Amazon's core field wouldn't want to spend time on something like that. So B2B, non-tech, smallish companies - which by their very nature I can't name a lot of, but there's a lot of them out there.
Re:Apple buys a company every three to four weeks
by Phillipharryt on Thursday February 25, 2021 @09:24AM
(#26263044)
In economic theory there is no benefit to diversification (which is what a company does when it absorbs another company) unless there are organisational improvements shared between the companies. If the acquired company is truly completely unrelated there would be no benefit at all as Apple isn't able to improve the running of an unrelated company. Being bought out by Apple might be a nice outcome for any company's shareholders (as they might get a premium on the their share prices), but technically there would be no improvement to the business in terms of expected revenue.
Given that, I would've thought that the earlier you buy the thing, the easier it is to integrate it with the rest of your company and the quicker you start gaining the benefits of that. Waiting to buy the winner shouldn't be any cheaper than buying all the competitors in the field at the start, because it's no secret how everyone's doing. So the only reasons not to develop in-house from day 1 are if you're not as good at developing things as a small independent company, or there's some other advantage that you're missing, or the option value from the fact that small companies can go bankrupt on their own (but that's only really applicable if the business is capital-intensive).