News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by Clewza313 on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:07AM (#26247420)
Interestingly, in Australia, major supermarket chain Woolworths used to have two parallel home brands: the bargain-basement Homebrand in stark black & white packaging, and the slightly better but still "designed in the DDR in the 1970s" Essentials. They had to ditch Homebrand, because it looked too cheap and was driving people to discount grocer Aldi, where you could get similar goods in packaging you wouldn't be ashamed to show friends.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/woolworths-is-killing-off...

https://www.woolworths.com.au/shop/discover/our-brands/essen...

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by dazc on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:18AM (#26247496)
Tesco, in the UK, did this too but only recently. They used to have a 'basics' range with labelling that said nothing but 'cheap'!

Instead, they now have these wholesome-sounding brands such as Redmere Farms, Nightingale Farms, etc which imply you're buying from some twee family business instead.

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by twic on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @03:00AM (#26247694)
'Basics' was Sainsbury's, Tesco had 'Value', with its incredibly bold branding:

https://logos.fandom.com/wiki/Tesco_Everyday_Value

They also have "Stockwell & Co" for the things which don't come from British farms, like jam and baked beans. That at least is a nod to history, because Tesco started out selling tea packaged by T. E. Stockwell.

They are entirely upfront about their brands:

https://www.tesco.com/groceries/en-GB/zone/exclusively-at-te...

It amuses me that their dairy brand is 'Creamfields', both because that's too obvious, and also a house music festival:

https://creamfields.com/

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by dazc on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @03:15AM (#26247790)
Thanks for the correction. The branding obviously works since I would have never dreamed of buying 'basics' or 'value' in their original branding but do sometimes buy the 'farm-brand' veg and 'Stockwell' products.

Wairtrose also have an 'Essentials' range although the labelling is very similar to regular priced products. I buy these without a second thought.

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @10:43AM (#26251084)
Same in NL, at least for a while; there was the semi-premium looking 'home brand', and there was the really shitty looking red-on-white Euroshopper brand, I believe that one actually showed up in a few grocery store chains. I haven't seen Euroshopper branded stuff in a while though.
Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by tomc1985 on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @01:18PM (#26253469)
Wal-Mart, Vons, and I'm sure a few others do this in the US. A super cheap brand, a mid-range brand, and sometimes even a high-end brand too. I can't remember their names off the top of my head but I think this tactic is common
Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by cataphract on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @10:57AM (#26251289)
They replaced it with the AH basic, which only looks marginally better.
Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by ObsoleteNerd on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:28AM (#26247553)
They kind of still do the split home brands, the “Essentials” brand is the super budget stuff and their “Woolworths” brand is the better-packaging stuff. There’s definitely products I’ve noticed that have both versions too.

Then they have heaps of other brands that are owned by them but have “proper” sounding brand names to give more illusion of choice.

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by frettchen on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @12:00PM (#26252304)
Still the case in Kroger's in the US - there's a few home brands: Private Selection (higher-end) Simple Truth (organic and "natural" products) Kroger (main home brand) Pssst (discount/low-end brand)
Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by raverbashing on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:31AM (#26247565)
Homebrand really looks like someone went the extra-mile to make it look cheap and cost less.

It's the kind of design you would expect at a government facility lowest bid kinda thing.

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by byhemechi on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @05:44PM (#26257182)
It's funny how this turned out, because in Sydney (at least the part where I live), any generic supermarket brand is referred to as "homebrand" instead of "own brand".

Also, don't forget about "Woolworths select", which was no better than homebrand but the tubs oats came in made really good pantry containers, and so in my kitchen anything loose like rice or almonds goes in them.

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by lethologica on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @06:11PM (#26257459)
I remember when it used to be called Black and Gold because those were the colours of the homebrand brand for Foodland.

As a kid I always hated having to buy that particular brand because it indicated to everyone that we weren’t able to afford “real” brands. (I’ve thankfully grown out of this mentality. Even now that I’m earning the most I ever have in my life I still try to stick to homebrand as much as possible)

Re:When did generic grocery brands get so good looking? by m463 on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @05:12AM (#26248440)
They tried this in the USA in the early 80's. Common products like paper towels in black-and-white "GENERIC" packaging.

Didn't last too long.

I think what people really want are "good enough" replacements for higher-priced brands, yet someone to take responsibility.