News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mypyc: Compile type-annotated Python to C by pjmlp on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:00AM (#26247378)
That is why I am so much into Julia, even with its adoption bumps.

The problem is not that Python lacks JITs, rather the community culture of rewriting code in C instead of contributing to JIT efforts.

Personally I just use a JVM/.NET based language, and if I need I can use the same C, C++ and Fortran libraries that Python uses anyway.

Re:Mypyc: Compile type-annotated Python to C by johnnycerberus on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @04:32AM (#26248220)
Julia was created to tackle problems in applied disciplines (physics, neuroscience, genetics, material engineering, etc.). I was expecting it not to be picked up by your everyday app developer or by the overly abstract functional programmer. As an afterthought, personally I think Julia can do much more than that, I would say it can do at least as much as Python is capable today, but better.
Re:Mypyc: Compile type-annotated Python to C by pjmlp on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @04:48AM (#26248303)
The ecosystem is slowly expanding beyond applied disciplines, because when those people need to code something else, e.g. a Web site for their research data, then as usual they try to use the hammer they already know.
Re:Mypyc: Compile type-annotated Python to C by throwaway894345 on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @02:23PM (#26254363)
I'm really interested in Julia's performance for general purpose application development. It's great that it can work with large numerical arrays very efficiently, but what about large, diverse graphs of small objects like you commonly find in general purpose application development? I think I want a hybrid between Julia and JVM or something.