News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Total Cookie Protection by tvprod1203 on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @10:02PM (#26246128)
> Well, another reason is because TLS (and formerly SSL) wasn't (weren't) just about encryption, but about a "web of trust." Encryption alone isn't trust.

Which is a nice principle, but given corporate and government incentives, the trust provided was lackluster at best. The PKI is pretty much broken because of it.

In the end, all it did is incur an unaffordable cost for hobbyist bloggers and other netizens.

Re:Total Cookie Protection by Thorrez on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @12:52AM (#26247044)
You used to be able to simply install a Firefox extension[1] or Android app[2] and automatically steal the accounts of everyone on your wifi network on every website. https stopped that.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firesheep

[2] http://faceniff.ponury.net/

Re:Total Cookie Protection by Macha on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @06:37AM (#26248907)
Widespread https did that. Firesheep motivated the big players to stop cheaping out and go fully https unlike approaches which did https for login pages only but it took let's encrypt also for https to become truly widespread
Re:Total Cookie Protection by Thorrez on Thursday February 25, 2021 @04:07AM (#26261076)
100% agree
Re:Total Cookie Protection by Spivak on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @10:53PM (#26246401)
Yeah, in the end it’s silly that we ended up with “trust” meaning only you’re connected to someone that controls the domain” which doesn’t actually need PKI to accomplish if we just supported a SRV record with the public key(s) and verifiably authoritative DNS queries.

Which fair it’s trading one PKI for another but web servers vastly outnumber authoritative DNS servers. But DKIM gets along fine without it so we probably could too.

Re:Total Cookie Protection by account42 on Wednesday February 24, 2021 @05:21AM (#26248491)
Well there is DANE but browser support is unfortunately missing.