News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by vidarh on Friday February 19, 2021 @06:35AM (#26192023)
In that world customers flow back to the many minicab companies and Uber competitors in London, which will need to take on more drivers.

It's not like Uber is the only app like this in London. I have at least four different ones on my app, and Uber is rarely the cheapest as it is.

Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by unishark on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:49AM (#26194368)
So minicab companies pay more and charge less than uber? How does that work economically? And wouldn't everyone just switch to the mincab companies, both drivers and passengers, if that's the case?
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by vidarh on Friday February 19, 2021 @12:54PM (#26195790)
Varies very much by company. Many of them are small operators covering much smaller areas than Uber. Many of them will intentionally keep far fewer drivers available to keep their drivers busier. I'm sure there are plenty who are much worse than Uber too, and there's plenty of room to get rid of more of these operators.

Uber has captured market share by being visible, and covering the whole city so you don't need to care which companies cover where you are. There are a few others that covers all of London and aim for the same over-supply of drivers, and most of them are not cheaper.

Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by phatfish on Saturday February 20, 2021 @10:42AM (#26204918)
Is it impossible to operate a mini-cab business more efficiently than Uber to a similar standard? I suspect it's pretty hard NOT to.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by unishark on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @07:40AM (#26236613)
And wouldn't everyone just switch to the mincab companies, both drivers and passengers, if that's the case?