Re:The frame rate of the universe (2009)
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Thursday February 18, 2021 @08:37PM
(#26188415)
Let's assume the simulation hypothesis is true: our universe is a computer program. Now what? Do our lives suddenly cease to have meaning?
It's not a judgement on he meaning of your life it's a judgement on the authenticity of your life and the accuracy of your view of the world.
Which view point is better -- one that believes in a flat earth or one that sees the world as spherical and all that this fact entails?
A flat Earther can't put a rover on Mars but someone who knows that the world is round can.
Imagine what a person who comes to understand that the world is a simulation could do.
Re:The frame rate of the universe (2009)
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday February 19, 2021 @07:59AM
(#26192642)
What you're really arguing for is a deeper understanding of the universe. Whether the universe is a simulation or not is irrelevant.
Re:The frame rate of the universe (2009)
by industriousthou on Thursday February 18, 2021 @07:52PM
(#26188064)
The thing is Truman and the characters in Westworld (I think, haven't seen it) are being manipulated to create a narrative.
I we were in a simulation where the creator(s) were hands off, just letting it run its course, then I don't think it really matters. If, on the other hand, they're pulling strings and manipulating outcomes for whatever reason, then it seems like it matters a lot more. At least that's my intuition.
Their arguments, no matter how clever, would be absurd when looking in from the outside.
If there's a high probability that the simulation hypothesis is true, it seems clinically insane to believe that it doesn't matter.