Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to various creditors last August

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by diplomatpuppy on Thursday February 18, 2021 @03:05PM (#26184715)

The local hospital handles the problem like this:

Doctor 1 gathers evidence and makes a preliminary diagnosis and writes it down. Doctor 1 then presents only the evidence to Doctor 2. Doctor 2 comes up with an independent diagnosis and writes it down. They then see if they match.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by sokoloff on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:39PM (#26186783)

Selecting which evidence to present leaves this process subject to some of the same errors. The evidence that leads doctor 1 to conclude the correct diagnosis is X is going to be passed along and other evidence may not be, so doctor 2 will diagnose the same. (This doesn't even have to be intentional. If I think I'm right, I'll be naturally inclined to provide evidence to that effect.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by hinkley on Thursday February 18, 2021 @03:44PM (#26185247)

Bleeding person with white coat syndrome gets upset because two doctors and a nurse asked them the same questions.

I mean, it's better than cutting off the wrong leg, but boy is it rough.

[ Parent | on HN ]