Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to various creditors last August

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by jessriedel on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:15PM (#26182554)

If a journalists writes "Vincent Fratta did X", this is something that can be verified or disputed by Fratta or his colleagues. If the journalists writes "A low-level employee did X", then it's much, much more difficult to verify or dispute.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by CivBase on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:41PM (#26182933)

Similarly, if a journalist writes "A judge ruled X for court case Y", this is something that can be verified or disputed using public records for the court case... but that court case is never identified in the article except for a link to a PDF document hosted by a third-party organization. The public records for that court case (including the linked document) identify those individuals - along with many more useful details - for anyone seeking further validation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by Chris2048 on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:43AM (#26194309)

Anonymous contributors where all the craze during the Trump admin, I'm not sure how dedicated the papers are to 3rd party verification.

Also, it's possible to reach out to Fratta and ask for comment beforehand - then you can either include that response, or lack of response, without naming them.

[ Parent | on HN ]