Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by moneywoes on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:08PM
(#26182463)
Are these actually enforceable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by ryandrake on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:19PM
(#26182605)
It probably doesn’t matter in practice. They will have more lawyers and more money to burn on legal process than you. Who will go bankrupt first fighting a legal battle between you and, say, Apple?
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by dv_dt on Thursday February 18, 2021 @04:01PM
(#26185452)
In practice, I don't think I've ever seen a SV example of that kind of litigation from garage development of IP. Maybe I've just missed them?
Theft of IP from one company to a new company on the other hand there are multiple public examples of.
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by ptudan on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:59PM
(#26183189)
The only time they'd actually sue is if you made something worth money. in that case, there's a good chance you can get investors to pay the lawsuit.
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by triceratops on Thursday February 18, 2021 @03:05PM
(#26184720)
Investors would check if you were subject to an IP assignment clause in your employment contract prior to investing. It's part of basic due diligence. They would then most likely pass on the investment.
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by lotsofpulp on Thursday February 18, 2021 @01:00PM
(#26183209)
It does matter in practice in California.
Re:There’s no such thing as “a startup within a big company”
by Mauricebranagh on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:39PM
(#26182905)
If its "related" to your employers business yes - unless you agree a variation of the contract.