News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Australia: PM Scott Morrison 'will not be intimi... by sofixa on Thursday February 18, 2021 @08:07AM (#26179366)
> News orgs could already block that content if they wanted using robots.txt, but have chosen not to - indeed, they go out of their way to sprinkle Facebook's opengraph and other metadata to make their content more searchable and present better when shared

Google is a monopoly on search. You could block it from indexing and it would drastically hurt you and your discoverability. Cutting your hand to spite you kind of thing. The same way you could in theory just not get telephone service or just not buy oil in historic US anti-trust actions. Media sites can't live of the little that trickles to them, and can't live without it either, with some exceptions ( like expensive paywalled editions like Financial Times). Thanking most news sources to piss off Murdoch and stop his crap from spreading might be worth it, for a few days but would be disastrous long term.

Re:Facebook Australia: PM Scott Morrison 'will not be intimi... by madeofpalk on Thursday February 18, 2021 @09:47AM (#26180359)
...right. Doesn't that say that news orgs get benefit from Google and Facebook then? Maybe Google should charge News Corp for highlighting and driving traffic towards them?
Re:Facebook Australia: PM Scott Morrison 'will not be intimi... by elyobo on Thursday February 18, 2021 @01:47PM (#26183844)
And that's precisely the point; the news orgs benefit enormously from the traffic that Google and Facebook send them.

Expecting Google and Facebook to provide them this traffic and pay the news orgs for it, not the other way around is nuts.