Re:Before buying a NYT subscription, here's what it'll take ...
by vincnetas on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:09AM
(#26178067)
Im not native english speaker, so i'm curious is word "notoriously" is used here properly. What i know "notoriously" means "known for something bad".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Before buying a NYT subscription, here's what it'll take ...
by shhac on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:31AM
(#26178207)
Notorious has at least two similar meanings; the more common one is "known unfavourably", the second meaning is a neutral "known", not positive or negative.
Most people only see the word used in the negative light so shy from it in the neutral use case to avoid being ambiguous or assumed negativity.
Using it with an adjective to clarify the meaning here is fine.
Re:Before buying a NYT subscription, here's what it'll take ...
by MauranKilom on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:51AM
(#26178343)
As a non-native speaker, my understanding of "notorious" so far has been what you described as the neutral form. However, to me, it does have a slight connotation of obsession or "doing it so much as to be annoying".
I am obviously not an authoritative source on how words are understood, but just wanted to add this data point.
Re:Before buying a NYT subscription, here's what it'll take ...
by chickenmonkey on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:12AM
(#26178085)
Yes, it's a weird use of notorious. The commenter could have said 'famously generous' instead.
Re:Before buying a NYT subscription, here's what it'll take ...
by brigandish on Thursday February 18, 2021 @06:45AM
(#26178723)
It’s not weird for native English speakers and is commonly partnered with a positive term.