Re:Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
by adrianN on Thursday February 18, 2021 @01:47AM
(#26176754)
Even if we already new how to do fusion we couldn't build fusion plants quickly enough to prevent catastrophic warming. Arguably we can't even build fission plants quickly enough for that. The window for fusion has closed, we should've invested forty years ago. Hoping for some breakthrough that allows us to build these fifty times faster than we currently believe we might be able to build them is a very risky maneuver.
Re:Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
by TylerE on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:28AM
(#26176266)
Uh, last time I checked we weren't able to do above-unity sustained fusion even at the mega-project level.
Source?
Re:Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
by FuckButtons on Thursday February 18, 2021 @01:30AM
(#26176642)
There are companies and research groups in a number of countries currently experimenting with next generation fusion devices which have a new class of superconductor in them as compared to ITER (in essence, they run at a higher cryogenic temperature so need less exotic refrigeration to operate). None have as yet proved their work to be commercially viable (to my knowledge) but there is real work being done.
Re:Electricity over $900/MWh in most of Western US now
by cbozeman on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:41AM
(#26176362)
The United States Patent Office.
And https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion...
I admit I myself am highly skeptical of this project... but I welcome it with open arms if its true.
If the patents are to be believed, then Lockheed-Martin's Skunkworks has developed a portable fusion reactor the size of an intermodal shipping container. I'd like to see those scaled up significantly for usage around the world, for a variety of reasons... extraordinarily cheap power for one, but far more manageable nuclear waste storage for another, and more important, reason.