The per active employee pricing model was driven by the level of uncertainty from companies on how many employees will use the office on a regular basis. For some of our clients who have opened their offices only 10-20% of their employees are using it. Customers would prefer not to pay for all their desks when only a small fraction are actually being used.
Good points on the cost accounting and predictability of costs. We haven't gotten pushback on that so far. But we'll keep an eye out.
Our workspaces are pretty personal. If you come into work, the chair is at the wrong height, monitors wrong, and you don't have what you need, it doesn't work.
But if you know you can have the same desk for the next 2 weeks on the days you want to come in, it can work. Losing the reservation or a penalty could be an interesting addition too -- we'll keep it in mind.
> If you’re one of the 3 of 4 people who wants to work flexibly post-pandemic, or if you manage a workplace, we’d love to hear from you.
One of those is Andy Jassy, CEO-elect at Amazon, who is on-record that Amazon is likely to switch to a hybrid model where folks would may be reserve desks when they intend to be in-office but mostly work remotely otherwise.
Absolutely a huge market.
> Worksphere is $6 per active employee/month, and our clients only pay for employees that come to the office.
Curious: What merited, if I may, the current model? Did you also happen to consider charging for something like total office-desks in management (that scales nicely and makes for a predictable cost accounting)?
Thanks.
[0] https://youtu.be/izbg7CpoSqg?t=2079